Ellington v. Automobile Credit Sales Co.
This text of 88 S.E. 565 (Ellington v. Automobile Credit Sales Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Automobile Credit Sales Company commenced an action, by attachment for purchase-money, against C. W. Ellington, J. S. Ellington, and V. L. Williams. The defendants filed an answer, which was amended. The plaintiff demurred to the answer as amended, and on the hearing the demurrer was sustained, and the plaintiff was allowed to proceed to verdict and judgment against the defendants. The defendants filed a direct bill of exceptions, in which error was assigned specifically on the judgment sustaining the demurrer to the answer; but there was no assignment of error upon the final judgment in the case. Meld, that the writ of error must be dismissed. Lyndon v. Georgia Railway &c. Co., 129 Ga. 353 (3), 354 (58 S. E. 1047). See also Carpenter v. First National Bank, 13 Ga. App. 497 (79 S. E. 360).
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
88 S.E. 565, 145 Ga. 53, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellington-v-automobile-credit-sales-co-ga-1916.