Harmon v. Lee

6 Iowa 171
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided June 12, 1858·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Stockton, J.

— There was no service in this case as required by the Code, (section 1721), sufficient to give the court jurisdiction, or to authorize judgment against defendant. If not found, the defendant may be served by leaving a copy of the notice -at his usual place of residence, with some member of his family, more than fourteen years of age. The return must state the time and manner of service — at whose house it was left — and the name of the person with whom it was left — or a sufficient reason must be given for omitting so to do. Where these requirements of the statute, as to the service, are not observed, the defendant is not in court, and any judgment against him is erroneous, and must be reversed. Pilkey v. Gleason, 1 Iowa, 85.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harmon v. Lee, 6 Iowa 171 (iowa 1858).

6 Iowa 171 (Harmon v. Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stier v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Ass'n
201 N.W. 328 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1924)
Spencer v. Berns
86 N.W. 209 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1901)