Harmander Gill v. Christopher Chestnut, et al.

• Court: District Court, E.D. California
• Decided: February 9, 2026
• Docket: 1:26-cv-00781
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HARMANDER GILL, No. 1:26-cv-00781-DC-EFB (HC) 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 CHRISTOHPER CHESTNUT, et al., 15 Respondents. 16 17 Petitioner, an immigration detainee who is representing himself, filed a petition for a writ 18 of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The court has conducted a preliminary review of 19 the petition pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 20 2254.1 Because petitioner may be entitled to the requested relief if the claimed violation of 21 constitutional rights is proved, respondent will be directed to show cause why the writ should not 22 be granted by filing an answer/return within 14 days from the date of this order. See 28 U.S.C. § 23 2243. Petitioner may file a reply/traverse to the answer/return within 7 days after being served a 24 copy of it. 25 //// 26

27 1 Rule 1(b) of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254 allows a district court to apply any or all of the rules to other types of habeas corpus petitions including § 2241 28 petitions. 1 Petitioner also seeks appointment of counsel. ECF No. 2. In light of the complexity of 2 the legal issues involved, the court has determined that the interests of justice require the 3 appointment of counsel for petitioner. See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B); see also Weygandt v. 4 Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983). Within seven days from the date of this order, the 5 appointing authority for the Eastern District of California shall identify counsel and send 6 counsel’s contact information to Nic Cannarozzi, Courtroom Deputy for Magistrate Judge 7 Edmund Brennan via email at ncannarozzi@caed.uscourts.gov who shall update the docket to 8 reflect counsel’s appointment. If counsel is not a member of the Eastern District of California 9 Criminal Justice Act Panel, the court hereby authorizes them to serve as CJA counsel for 10 petitioner for the duration of the proceedings in this court pursuant to Local Rule 180(b)(1). 11 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 12 1. Petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 2) is GRANTED. 13 2. Within seven days from the date of this order, the appointing authority for the Eastern 14 District of California shall identify counsel and send counsel’s contact information to 15 Nic Cannarozzi, Courtroom Deputy for Magistrate Judge Edmund Brennan via email 16 at ncannarozzi@caed.uscourts.gov who shall update the docket to reflect counsel’s 17 appointment. 18 3. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order on the Federal Defender, 19 Attention: Habeas Appointment, along with a copy of the § 2241 petition. 20 4. Additionally, the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order together with a 21 copy of petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 22 2241 on the United States Attorney. 23 5. Respondent is directed to file an answer/return within 14 days from the date of this 24 order. If an answer/return is filed, respondent shall include with the answer/return any 25 and all transcripts or other documents relevant to the determination of the issues 26 presented in the application. 27 6. Petitioner’s reply/traverse, if any, is due within 7 days after being served a copy of 28 respondent’s answer/return. 1 7. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order together with a copy of 2 petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on 3 the United States Attorney. 4 8. In order to ensure this court’s jurisdiction to resolve the pending § 2241 petition, 5 respondent shall not transfer petitioner to another detention center outside of this 6 judicial district, pending further order of the court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) 7 (establishing the All Writs Act which empowers the federal courts to “issue all writs 8 necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective jurisdictions….”); see also F.T.C. v. 9 Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (emphasizing that federal courts have the 10 power to “to preserve the court’s jurisdiction or maintain the status quo by injunction 11 pending review of an agency’s action”). 12 DATED: February 9, 2026

19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28