Harlow v. Curtis
This text of 121 Mass. 320 (Harlow v. Curtis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
No contract between the parties was ever completed, except for fish to be packed in drums and sent to Boston. The plaintiff afterwards proposed to change the contract by sending the fish directly to Plymouth, not packed in drums. To this the defendants agreed upon certain conditions, to wit, that the plaintiff would allow a commission of 2-J per cent., which was the profit which, upon the evidence, the defendants would have made upon the contract as agreed upon. The plaintiff refused to accept the condition. There was, therefore, never an agreement between the parties, by which the defendants were to send the fish to Plymouth, as declared on in the plaintiff’s declaration. The change which the plaintiff proposed in the agreement was one against the defendants’ interest, which they were under no obligation to make except upon agreed terms, and no such terms were agreed upon. Exceptions sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
121 Mass. 320, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harlow-v-curtis-mass-1876.