Harlan v. State

32 S.W.2d 185, 116 Tex. Crim. 191, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 702
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harlan v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 116 Tex. Crim. 208
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 4, 1930·No. No. 13498.·Published

Opinions

Conviction is for manufacturing intoxicating liquor, punishment being one year in the penitentiary.

As it appears in the record the appeal bond is approved by the sheriff only. Art. 818, C. C. P. (1925) requires that it be approved by both the sheriff and the trial judge. For authorities see Note 1, under said article in Vernon's Ann. Tex. C. C. P., Vol. 3.

The bills of exception seem defective in not setting out the search warrant and affidavit therefor, but we do not discuss them as the case is not properly before us.

If appellant desires to do so he will have fifteen days from this date to file proper bond and present a record thereof to this court in connection with motion to reinstate the appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

ON MOTION TO REINSTATE.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harlan v. State, 32 S.W.2d 185, 116 Tex. Crim. 191, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 702 (Tex. 1930).

32 S.W.2d 185 (Harlan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jenkins v. State
24 S.W.2d 1092 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1930)
Coleman v. State
10 S.W.2d 559 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Buchanan v. State
298 S.W. 569 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1927)
Fisher v. State
1 S.W.2d 301 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1927)