Harlan v. State

32 S.W.2d 182, 116 Tex. Crim. 208, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 710
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 4, 1930
DocketNo. 13496.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 32 S.W.2d 182 (Harlan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harlan v. State, 32 S.W.2d 182, 116 Tex. Crim. 208, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 710 (Tex. 1930).

Opinions

Conviction is for possessing a still for manufacturing intoxicating liquor, punishment being three years in the penitentiary.

As it appears in the record the appeal bond is approved by the sheriff only. Art. 818, C. C. P. (1925) requires that it be approved by both the sheriff and the trial judge. For authorities see Note 1, under said article in Vernon's Ann. Tex. C. C. P., Vol. 3.

The bills of exception seem defective in not setting out the search warrant and affidavit therefor, but we do not discuss them as the case is not properly before us.

If appellant desires to do so he will have fifteen days from this date to file proper bond and present a record thereof to this court in connection with motion to reinstate the appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

ON MOTION TO REINSTATE.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. State
42 S.W.2d 1017 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 S.W.2d 182, 116 Tex. Crim. 208, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 710, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harlan-v-state-texcrimapp-1930.