Harkins v. Cathey

119 N.C. 649
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 15, 1896·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

Fukoiiks, <L:

Tlie Court being of the opinion that the opinion, findings and judgment of the court below were correct and should be affirmed if the act of 1895, Ch. 159, known as “ The Election Law,” is constitutional;

Aud it having been decided in the case of McDonald v. Morrow, at this Term, that said act is constitutional, therefore, adopting the discussion of the constitutional question in the case of McDonald v. Morrow and the opinion of the court below for the discussion of the other matters involved in the case as the opinion of this Court, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harkins v. Cathey, 119 N.C. 649 (N.C. 1896).

119 N.C. 649 (Harkins v. Cathey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Woodall v. Western Wake Highway Commission
97 S.E. 226 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1918)
Mullen v. Morrow
123 N.C. 773 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1898)
State Ex Rel. Quinn v. Lattimore
26 S.E. 638 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1897)