Harker v. Shamoto
95 P.3d 627
This text of 95 P.3d 627 (Harker v. Shamoto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Harker v. Shamoto, 95 P.3d 627 (haw 2004).
Opinion
DR. GEORGE R. HARKER, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
JUDITH SHAMOTO, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS; PATRICIA HAMAMOTO, SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, AND ROBYN HONDA, PERSONNEL SPECIALIST FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Respondents-Appellees.
In the Supreme Court of Hawaii.
Dr. George R. Harker, petitioner-appellant, appearing pro se.
ORDER DENYING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
MOON, C.J., for the court.[1]
Petitioner-appellant Dr. George R. Harker's application for writ of certiorari, filed June 14, 2004, is hereby denied.
NOTES
[1] Considered by: Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
95 P.3d 627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harker-v-shamoto-haw-2004.