Hardy v. State

610 S.W.2d 511, 1981 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 877
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 21, 1981
Docket66169
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 610 S.W.2d 511 (Hardy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hardy v. State, 610 S.W.2d 511, 1981 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 877 (Tex. 1981).

Opinions

OPINION

DALLY, Judge.

This is an attempt to appeal from an order deferring adjudication and placing Appellant on probation for a period of three years. The record reflects that Appellant was charged with the offense of possession of a controlled substance, namely methamphetamine. Art. 4476-15, § 4.04, V.A.C.S.

The record further reflects that Appellant waived trial by jury and entered a plea of guilty before the court. The trial court heard evidence and found that it substantiated Appellant’s guilt. The trial court, however, entered an order deferring adjudication of guilt and placed Appellant on probation for three years under the provisions of Art. 42.12, § 3d, V.A.C.C.P. (felony deferred adjudication). No motion requesting a final adjudication was ever filed by Appellant. Notice of appeal was given in open court from the order deferring adjudication.

In McDougal v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 610 S.W.2d 509, (No. 66,249 delivered this day) we held that there was no appeal from an order deferring adjudication under Art. 42.13, § 3d (misdemeanor deferred adjudication). As we stated in McDougal v. State, supra, if a defendant is dissatisfied with the decision to defer adjudication or with the terms and conditions of the order, his proper remedy is to move for final adjudication as provided in Art. 42.12, § 3d(a). After adjudication of guilt, a defendant’s normal appellate remedies are available to him.

This purported appeal from an order deferring adjudication is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Horner v. Reed
756 S.W.2d 34 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1988)
David v. State
681 S.W.2d 147 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1984)
Coleman v. State
632 S.W.2d 616 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1982)
Daniels v. State
615 S.W.2d 771 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1981)
Hardy v. State
610 S.W.2d 511 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
610 S.W.2d 511, 1981 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hardy-v-state-texcrimapp-1981.