Hardy v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hardy v. State

822 So. 2d 553, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10443, 2002 WL 1726534

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 26, 2002

DocketNo. 1D02-1442

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 822 So. 2d 553 (Hardy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hardy v. State, 822 So. 2d 553, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10443, 2002 WL 1726534 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This petition seeks belated appeal of a judgment and sentence. Although a timely notice of appeal was originally filed, appellate counsel failed to file a docketing statement and failed to respond to this court’s order to pay the filing fee or obtain a certifícate of indigency. The result was dismissal of the direct appeal. This constitutes ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. McClain v. Moore, 775 So.2d 1003 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); Wyatt v. State, 697 So.2d 1289 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997).

Accordingly, we grant the petition, reinstate petitioner’s appeal in case number 1D01-0366 and relinquish jurisdiction to the trial court for 30 days to determine whether petitioner is entitled to be certified as an indigent or qualifies for court appointed counsel in case number 1D01-0366.

Substitute counsel shall have 30 days thereafter within which to ensure transmittal of the record on appeal to this court and 30 days thereafter in which to file the initial brief in case number 1D01-0366.

PETITION GRANTED.

DAVIS, VAN NORTWICK and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI