Hardy v. State

779 So. 2d 396, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9442, 2000 WL 1034620
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 28, 2000
DocketNo. 2D97-2117
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 779 So. 2d 396 (Hardy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hardy v. State, 779 So. 2d 396, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9442, 2000 WL 1034620 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Earnest Hardy, III, appeals his judgments of conviction for offenses occurring on June 22, 1996, and the sentences imposed under the 1995 sentencing guidelines. We affirm the convictions without further discussion.

However, the supreme court recently announced that chapter 95-184, Laws of Florida, violated the single-subject provision of article III, section 6, of the Florida Constitution. See Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000). We, therefore, remand this case to the trial court to reconsider the sentences. See Smith v. State, 761 So.2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., GREEN, and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Huntington Nat. Bank v. Merrill Lynch
779 So. 2d 396 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
779 So. 2d 396, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9442, 2000 WL 1034620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hardy-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.