Hardy v. Birmingham Board of Education

601 So. 2d 98, 1992 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 267, 1992 WL 126543
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided June 12, 1992·No. 2900193-X·Published

Opinion

AFTER REMAND FROM SUPREME COURT

RUSSELL, Judge.

The portion of this court’s prior judgment requiring that the Board continue paying the employee pending the outcome of the review panel’s hearing has been reversed by the Supreme Court of Alabama. On remand to this court, and in compliance with the supreme court’s opinion of May 15, 1992, 601 So.2d 93, this cause is now affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded to the trial court for a judgment consistent with the supreme court’s opinion.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

ROBERTSON, P.J., and THIGPEN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hardy v. Birmingham Board of Education, 601 So. 2d 98, 1992 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 267, 1992 WL 126543 (Ala. Ct. App. 1992).

601 So. 2d 98 (Hardy v. Birmingham Board of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Birmingham Bd. of Educ.
601 So. 2d 93 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1992)