Hardy v. Beeler

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hardy v. Beeler. Read the opinion of the Court — 88 F. App'x 648
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 26, 2004·No. 03-7305·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7305

HENRY HARDY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ALBERT F. BEELER, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-03-570)

Submitted: December 19, 2003 Decided: February 26, 2004

Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henry Hardy, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Henry Hardy, a federal prisoner, appeals the district

court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Hardy v. Beeler, No. CA-03-570 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 1, 2003).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hardy v. Beeler, (4th Cir. 2004).

Hardy v. Beeler (Hardy v. Beeler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241