Hardy v. Beeler

Fourth Circuit

Hardy v. Beeler

88 F. App'x 648

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 26, 2004

DocketNo. 03-7305

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 88 F. App'x 648 (Hardy v. Beeler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hardy v. Beeler, 88 F. App'x 648 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Henry Hardy, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hardy v. Beeler, No. CA-03-570 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 1, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Henry Hardy, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hardy v. Beeler, No. CA-03-570 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 1, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

88 F. App'x 648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hardy-v-beeler-ca4-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack