Hardy v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.

2015 Ark. App. 674
CourtCourt of Appeals of Arkansas
DecidedNovember 18, 2015
DocketCV-15-628
StatusPublished

This text of 2015 Ark. App. 674 (Hardy v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hardy v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs., 2015 Ark. App. 674 (Ark. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 674

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CV-15-628

Opinion Delivered November 18, 2015

TERESA HARDY APPEAL FROM THE YELL COUNTY APPELLANT CIRCUIT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT V. [NO. JV-14-1]

ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HONORABLE TERRY SULLIVAN, HUMAN SERVICES and MINOR JUDGE CHILDREN APPELLEES AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED

WAYMOND M. BROWN, Judge

The Yell County Circuit Court terminated the parental rights of appellant Teresa

Hardy to her two children, D.W. and J.C.1 Hardy’s counsel has filed a motion to withdraw

and a no-merit brief, pursuant to Linker-Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human Services,2 and

Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 6-9(i),3 contending that there are no meritorious grounds to

support an appeal. The clerk of our court mailed a certified copy of counsel’s motion and

brief to appellant, informing her of her right to file pro se points for reversal. Appellant has

not filed any pro se points.

1 The court also accepted the legal fathers’ consents to termination of parental rights. 2 359 Ark. 131, 194 S.W.3d 739 (2004). 3 (2015). Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 674

Having carefully examined the record and the no-merit brief, we conclude that counsel

has complied with the requirements established by the Arkansas Supreme Court for no-merit

appeals in termination cases and that the appeal is wholly without merit. Accordingly, we

affirm the termination of appellant’s parental rights by memorandum opinion.4 We also grant

counsel’s motion to withdraw.

Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted.

GRUBER and VAUGHT, JJ., agree.

Leah Lanford, Arkansas Public Defender Commission, for appellant.

No response.

4 See In re Memorandum Opinions, 16 Ark. App. 301, 700 S.W.2d 63 (1985).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Linker-Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human Services
194 S.W.3d 739 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2004)
In Re Memorandum Opinions
700 S.W.2d 63 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2015 Ark. App. 674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hardy-v-ark-dept-of-human-servs-arkctapp-2015.