Hardwood Sawdust Co. v. Metro Export Packers, Inc.

187 Misc. 450, 66 N.Y.S.2d 386, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3070
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 27, 1946·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Memorandum

Per Curiam.

The premises in question constitute “ commercial space ” within the meaning of the Commercial Rent Law, chapter 3 of the Laws of 1945, as amended by chapter 272 of the Laws of 1946. Plaintiff, therefore, had the burden of proving that the rent charged was not greater than the emergency rent for such commercial space. (Flo-Ru-Na Inc. v. Zimmerman, 185 Misc. 759.) Plaintiff failed to sustain that burden. .

The judgment should be unanimously reversed upon the law, and new trial granted, with $30 costs to defendants to abide the. event.

MacCrate, Smith and Steiebrink, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hardwood Sawdust Co. v. Metro Export Packers, Inc., 187 Misc. 450, 66 N.Y.S.2d 386, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3070 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

187 Misc. 450 (Hardwood Sawdust Co. v. Metro Export Packers, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Empire Plexiglass Corp. v. Enterprise Industries, Inc.
191 Misc. 58 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1947)
Hardwood Sawdust Co. v. Metro Export Packers, Inc.
271 A.D.2d 754 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946)