Flo-Ru-Na Inc. v. Zimmerman
This text of 185 Misc. 759 (Flo-Ru-Na Inc. v. Zimmerman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The landlord presented no evidence to sustain its burden of proof under the Commercial Bent Law (L. 1945, ch. 3, as amd. by L. 1945, ch. 315) that “ the rent charged is not greater than the emergency rent for such commercial space.” (L. 1945, ch. 3, § 6, clause [a].)
The lease between the parties, with its stipulated rental, is not an agreement fixing an emergency rent within the meaning of the statute. Nor may it be taken as a waiver on the tenant’s part of any of the benefits conferred upon him by the statute (L. 1945, ch. 315, § 12).
The final order should be unanimously reversed upon the law, with $10 costs, and a new trial granted, with $10 costs to the tenant to abide the event.
Mac Crate, McCooey and Steinbrink, JJ., concur.
Order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
185 Misc. 759, 58 N.Y.S.2d 483, 1945 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flo-ru-na-inc-v-zimmerman-nyappterm-1945.