Hardnett v. M & T Bank

Fourth Circuit

Hardnett v. M & T Bank

699 F. App'x 242

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 23, 2017·No. No. 17-1538·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Fredicia Hardnett and Wilbert A. Hard-nett appeal the district court’s" order dismissing their suit and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hardnett v. M & T Bank, No. 3:15-cv-00622-MHL (E.D. Va. Aug. 31 & Sept. 19, 2016; Apr. 13, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Fredicia Hardnett and Wilbert A. Hard-nett appeal the district court’s" order dismissing their suit and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hardnett v. M & T Bank, No. 3:15-cv-00622-MHL (E.D. Va. Aug. 31 & Sept. 19, 2016; Apr. 13, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Hardnett v. M & T Bank, 699 F. App'x 242 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

699 F. App'x 242 (Hardnett v. M & T Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related