Harding v. United States Figure Skating Ass'n
This text of 879 F. Supp. 1053 (Harding v. United States Figure Skating Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
AMENDED ORDER
On November 29, 1994, I issued an order vacating two prior Orders in this case. In addition to those two orders, however, an additional order should have been vacated at that time. Thus, this Order will amend the November 29, 1994 Order. In addition to vacating the Orders of March 9, 1994, granting plaintiffs motion for a temporary restraining order and March 31, 1994, granting plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction, I vacate my Order of April 29, 1994 in which I granted defendant’s motion to dismiss and defendant’s motion for reconsideration. 1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
. The Opinion dated May 3, 1994, 851 F.Supp. 1476, explained the Order issued April 29, 1994 and is not itself an appealable Order. Thus, vacating the April 29, 1994 Order is sufficient.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
879 F. Supp. 1053, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7304, 1995 WL 118740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harding-v-united-states-figure-skating-assn-ord-1995.