Harding v. State

322 So. 2d 733, 56 Ala. App. 443, 1974 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1030
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided October 1, 1974·No. 1 Div. 458·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

[444]*444ON REHEARING

CATES, Presiding Judge.

On a consideration of the application for a rehearing the original affirmance (without opinion) is abated. The cause is remanded to the lower court for consideration of the Youthful Offenders Act.

We are constrained to this action by the cogent dictum in Morgan v. State, 291 Ala. 764, 287 So.2d 914. See also, Edwards v. State, 55 Ala.App. 544, 317 So.2d 511, Pride v. State (8 Div. 537), 55 Ala.App. 575, 317 So.2d 541, and Clemons v. State, 56 Ala.App. 728, 321 So.2d 237, all this day decided.

Accordingly, the application is granted and the cause is

Remanded with directions.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harding v. State, 322 So. 2d 733, 56 Ala. App. 443, 1974 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1030 (Ala. Ct. App. 1974).

322 So. 2d 733 (Harding v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thompson v. State
354 So. 2d 1128 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1976)
Harding v. State
322 So. 2d 734 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1975)
Harding v. State
322 So. 2d 733 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1974)