Harden v. Doe

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided December 8, 2020·No. 7:19-cv-03839·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PAUL HARDEN, Plaintiff, -against- 19 CIVIL 3839 (VB) JUDGMENT LORIE BADGER and SERGEANT SAHAD, Defendants.

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated December 7, 2020, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962); accordingly, this case is closed. Dated: New York, New York December 8, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: i A a > HK Mange Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harden v. Doe, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Harden v. Doe (Harden v. Doe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)