Hardecker v. Klem

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hardecker v. Klem

249 A.D. 736, 291 N.Y.S. 671, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5804

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 4, 1936

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 249 A.D. 736 (Hardecker v. Klem) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hardecker v. Klem, 249 A.D. 736, 291 N.Y.S. 671, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5804 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Action for damages as a consequence of the collision of two automobiles. Order of the County Court of Suffolk county in so far as it denies defendant’s motion to vacate the ex parte order and to strike out the reply reversed on the law, without costs, and motion granted to that extent, without costs. In all other respects the order is affirmed, without costs. A reply may only be required to be served on defendant’s • motion. The ex parte order, therefore, was unauthorized and the service of a reply pursuant thereto was likewise unauthorized. Since the appeal, however, presents no practical question in these particulars because the new matter is deemed to be controverted by traverse or avoidance (Civ. Prae. Act, § 243), no costs are allowed. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action for damages as a consequence of the collision of two automobiles. Order of the County Court of Suffolk county in so far as it denies defendant’s motion to vacate the ex parte order and to strike out the reply reversed on the law, without costs, and motion granted to that extent, without costs. In all other respects the order is affirmed, without costs. A reply may only be required to be served on defendant’s • motion. The ex parte order, therefore, was unauthorized and the service of a reply pursuant thereto was likewise unauthorized. Since the appeal, however, presents no practical question in these particulars because the new matter is deemed to be controverted by traverse or avoidance (Civ. Prae. Act, § 243), no costs are allowed. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 A.D. 736, 291 N.Y.S. 671, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hardecker-v-klem-nyappdiv-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack