Ferrainolo v. Prudential Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ferrainolo v. Prudential Insurance

12 A.D.2d 720, 208 N.Y.S.2d 136, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6815

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 1, 1960

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 12 A.D.2d 720 (Ferrainolo v. Prudential Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ferrainolo v. Prudential Insurance, 12 A.D.2d 720, 208 N.Y.S.2d 136, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6815 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously modified by striking therefrom the third ordering paragraph and as modified affirmed, with $25 costs and disbursements to the plaintiff-respondent. Memorandum: In our opinion it was [721]*721error to permit the plaintiff to serve a reply to the affirmative defense set forth in the answer. (See Hardecker v. Klem, 249 App. Div. 736; Taubenfeld v. Taubenfeld, 197 Misc. 1072.) (Appeal from order of Monroe Special Term denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment and -granting plaintiff’s cross motion to serve a reply and for a separate trial of the defense of release.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously modified by striking therefrom the third ordering paragraph and as modified affirmed, with $25 costs and disbursements to the plaintiff-respondent. Memorandum: In our opinion it was [721]*721error to permit the plaintiff to serve a reply to the affirmative defense set forth in the answer. (See Hardecker v. Klem, 249 App. Div. 736; Taubenfeld v. Taubenfeld, 197 Misc. 1072.) (Appeal from order of Monroe Special Term denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment and -granting plaintiff’s cross motion to serve a reply and for a separate trial of the defense of release.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 720, 208 N.Y.S.2d 136, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferrainolo-v-prudential-insurance-nyappdiv-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack