Harbury v. Deutch

D.C. Circuit

Harbury v. Deutch

244 F.3d 960, 345 U.S. App. D.C. 280, 2001 WL 333049

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedApril 6, 2001

DocketNo. 99-5307

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 244 F.3d 960 (Harbury v. Deutch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harbury v. Deutch, 244 F.3d 960, 345 U.S. App. D.C. 280, 2001 WL 333049 (D.C. Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinions

A statement of Circuit Judge HENDERSON dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc, joined by Circuit Judge SENTELLE, is attached.

Circuit Judge GARLAND did not participate in this matter.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellees’ petition for rehearing en banc and the response thereto have been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular active service did not vote in favor of the [961]*961petition. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the petition be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI