Haque v. United States

620 F. App'x 1
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedOctober 1, 2015
DocketNo. 15-5188
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 620 F. App'x 1 (Haque v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haque v. United States, 620 F. App'x 1 (D.C. Cir. 2015).

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief and the supplement thereto filed by appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s dismissal of appellant’s action without prejudice be affirmed. The district correctly determined appellant’s complaint failed to meet the requirements [2]*2of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a). See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 677-79, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gardner v. Wells Fargo Bank NA
E.D. Washington, 2020

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
620 F. App'x 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haque-v-united-states-cadc-2015.