Hanson v. State
39 S.E. 942, 114 Ga. 104, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 587
Opinion
1. It is not, in a trial for the offense of using opprobrious words, erroneous to charge the jury that if the accused used to the prosecutor the language charged in the indictment, it is for them to determine' whether or not he had provocation so to do, and “whether or not-the provocation, if there was any, was sufficient to justify the defendant in the use of such language. ” Echols v. State, 110 Ga. 257.
2. The verdict in this case was fully supported by evidence.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hanson v. State, 39 S.E. 942, 114 Ga. 104, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 587 (Ga. 1901).
39 S.E. 942 (Hanson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wiggins v. State
88 S.E. 411 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Jackson v. State
80 S.E. 20 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Fish v. State
52 S.E. 737 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)