Echols v. State
34 S.E. 289, 110 Ga. 257, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 505
Opinion
1. On the trial of one indicted for using opprobrious words, it is for the jury to determine whether or not there was provocation sufficient to excuse their use. Collins v. State, 78 Ga. 88; Williams v. State, 105 Ga. 608, and citations.
2. The evidence authorized the verdict.
Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Echols v. State, 34 S.E. 289, 110 Ga. 257, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 505 (Ga. 1899).
34 S.E. 289 (Echols v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Raines v. State
36 S.E.2d 64 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1945)
Wiggins v. State
88 S.E. 411 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Jackson v. State
82 S.E. 253 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Fish v. State
52 S.E. 737 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)
Hanson v. State
39 S.E. 942 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)