Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hanson v. State

Hanson v. State

901 So. 2d 407, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 7061, 2005 WL 1130210
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hanson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 905 So. 2d 1036 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 16, 2005·No. No. 1D05-0969·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jimmie Marion Hanson petitions this court for a writ of error coram nobis, habeas corpus, or mandamus. He contends that the assistant public defender who represented him in the trial court was ineffective in several respects.

We deny the instant petition without addressing the merits of these claims because Hanson’s remedy is a motion for postconviction relief in the trial court. Petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel is also denied.

PETITION DENIED.

BARFIELD, DAVIS and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hanson v. State, 901 So. 2d 407, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 7061, 2005 WL 1130210 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

901 So. 2d 407 (Hanson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.