Hanson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hanson v. State

901 So. 2d 407, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 7061, 2005 WL 1130210

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 16, 2005

DocketNo. 1D05-0969

StatusPublished

This text of 901 So. 2d 407 (Hanson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hanson v. State, 901 So. 2d 407, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 7061, 2005 WL 1130210 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jimmie Marion Hanson petitions this court for a writ of error coram nobis, habeas corpus, or mandamus. He contends that the assistant public defender who represented him in the trial court was ineffective in several respects.

We deny the instant petition without addressing the merits of these claims because Hanson’s remedy is a motion for postconviction relief in the trial court. Petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel is also denied.

PETITION DENIED.

BARFIELD, DAVIS and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jimmie Marion Hanson petitions this court for a writ of error coram nobis, habeas corpus, or mandamus. He contends that the assistant public defender who represented him in the trial court was ineffective in several respects.

We deny the instant petition without addressing the merits of these claims because Hanson’s remedy is a motion for postconviction relief in the trial court. Petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel is also denied.

PETITION DENIED.

BARFIELD, DAVIS and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

901 So. 2d 407, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 7061, 2005 WL 1130210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hanson-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.