Hanson v. Rice

92 N.W. 982, 88 Minn. 273, 1903 Minn. LEXIS 394
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedJanuary 16, 1903
DocketNos. 13,148-(192)
StatusPublished
Cited by22 cases

This text of 92 N.W. 982 (Hanson v. Rice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hanson v. Rice, 92 N.W. 982, 88 Minn. 273, 1903 Minn. LEXIS 394 (Mich. 1903).

Opinion

BROWN, X

This action was brought under the provisions of Laws 1893, c. 68, to determine the boundary line between tracts of land owned by the respective parties. Plaintiffs had judgment in the court below, and defendants appealed from an order denying their motion for a new trial.

The facts are as follows: Plaintiffs own fractional lot 7 in section 4 of township 121, range 35, Kandiyohi county, and defendants own fractional lots 2 and 4 in the same section. The boundary line sought to be established is that extending north and south between lot 7 and lots 2 and 4. Lot 7 lies immediately south of Swan Lake, and lots 2 and 4 to the west and southwest. In the survey of this land a meander line was run, presumably with reference to the lake, but at a considerable distance from its actual shore, — some thirty rods or more at one point, — and the lots in question abut thereon. Between the meander line and the shore of the lake there evidently was at the time of the survey, and still is, quite a body of high, dry land, on which is a heavy growth of timber. To the southwest of the lake, and between it and the meander line, is a large slough, and no doubt the meander line was run with reference to this slough as a part of the lake. The line between lots 2 and 4 running east and west would,- if extended beyond the meander line, reach the lake shore, though the south line of lot 4, if so extended in a direct course, would not touch the lake at all. The lines of lot 7 running north and south would, if so extended, also reach the lake.

[276]*276

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Michael L. Pogreba v. Lorraine Pogreba, Janet Bowen
Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 2024
Reads Landing Campers Ass'n v. Township of Pepin
546 N.W.2d 10 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1996)
Boekeloo v. Kuschinski
324 N.W.2d 104 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1982)
Erickson v. Wick
591 P.2d 804 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1979)
Bliss v. Kinsey
233 So. 2d 191 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
State v. Adams
89 N.W.2d 661 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1957)
State v. Longyear Holding Co.
29 N.W.2d 657 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1947)
Provo City v. Jacobsen
176 P.2d 130 (Utah Supreme Court, 1947)
State v. Aucoin
20 So. 2d 136 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1944)
Schmidt v. Marschel
2 N.W.2d 121 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1942)
In Re Petition of Schaller
259 N.W. 529 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1935)
Moscrip v. Webster Lumber Co.
204 N.W. 326 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1925)
Karterud v. Karterud
195 N.W. 972 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1923)
Rue v. Oregon & Washington Railroad
186 P. 1074 (Washington Supreme Court, 1920)
Rooney v. County of Stearns
153 N.W. 858 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1915)
Willetts v. Scudder
144 P. 87 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1914)
Tucker v. Mortenson
148 N.W. 60 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1914)
Burton v. Isaacson
142 N.W. 925 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1913)
Ulbright v. Baslington
119 P. 292 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1911)
Scheifert v. Briegel
63 L.R.A. 296 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 N.W. 982, 88 Minn. 273, 1903 Minn. LEXIS 394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hanson-v-rice-minn-1903.