Hanselman v. Illinois Department of Corrections

S.D. Illinois

Hanselman v. Illinois Department of Corrections

DecidedMay 22, 2025

Docket3:23-cv-02824

StatusUnknown

This text of Hanselman v. Illinois Department of Corrections (Hanselman v. Illinois Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hanselman v. Illinois Department of Corrections, (S.D. Ill. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

BARRY HANSELMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 3:23-cv-02824-GCS ) ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF ) CORRECTIONS, ) ) Defendant. )

ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE

SISON, Magistrate Judge:

Plaintiff Barry Hanselman filed this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983 in the Southern District of Illinois on August 16, 2023. (Doc. 1). His complaint alleges violations of his constitutional rights while incarcerated at Graham Correctional Facility (“Graham”) in Montgomery County, Illinois. Id. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1391, a civil lawsuit may be filed in (1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all defendants reside in the same state; (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred; or (3) a judicial district in which any defendant is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction with respect to the action, if there is no district in which the action may otherwise be brought. When a case is filed in the wrong judicial district, the district court shall dismiss the case or, if it is in the interest of justice, transfer the case to a district where it could have been brought. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). “[A] court may sua sponte transfer a case for improper venue.” MB Financial Bank, N.A. v. Walker, 741 F. Supp. 2d 912, 915 (N.D. Ill. 2010). Here, the only remaining Defendant in this case is the Illinois Department of Corrections, and all the events giving rise to Plaintiff's claims occurred at Graham in Montgomery County, Illinois, which is in the Central District of Illinois. See 28 U.S.C. § 93. Thus, the Court finds that the Central District of Illinois is the appropriate forum for hearing and adjudicating this action and that it is in the interest of justice to transfer this case to that district. Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) and 1406(a), IT IS ORDERED that this action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois for such further proceedings as that Court may deem appropriate. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: May 21, 2025. □ hee Seon by Stlnt 0. Dee ate: 2025.05.21 16:32:09 -05'00' GILBERTC.SISON United States Magistrate Judge

Page 2 of 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

BARRY HANSELMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 3:23-cv-02824-GCS ) ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF ) CORRECTIONS, ) ) Defendant. )

ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE

SISON, Magistrate Judge:

Plaintiff Barry Hanselman filed this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983 in the Southern District of Illinois on August 16, 2023. (Doc. 1). His complaint alleges violations of his constitutional rights while incarcerated at Graham Correctional Facility (“Graham”) in Montgomery County, Illinois. Id. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1391, a civil lawsuit may be filed in (1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all defendants reside in the same state; (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred; or (3) a judicial district in which any defendant is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction with respect to the action, if there is no district in which the action may otherwise be brought. When a case is filed in the wrong judicial district, the district court shall dismiss the case or, if it is in the interest of justice, transfer the case to a district where it could have been brought. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). “[A] court may sua sponte transfer a case for improper venue.” MB Financial Bank, N.A. v. Walker, 741 F. Supp. 2d 912, 915 (N.D. Ill. 2010). Here, the only remaining Defendant in this case is the Illinois Department of Corrections, and all the events giving rise to Plaintiff's claims occurred at Graham in Montgomery County, Illinois, which is in the Central District of Illinois. See 28 U.S.C. § 93. Thus, the Court finds that the Central District of Illinois is the appropriate forum for hearing and adjudicating this action and that it is in the interest of justice to transfer this case to that district. Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) and 1406(a), IT IS ORDERED that this action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois for such further proceedings as that Court may deem appropriate. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: May 21, 2025. □ hee Seon by Stlnt 0. Dee ate: 2025.05.21 16:32:09 -05'00' GILBERTC.SISON United States Magistrate Judge

Page 2 of 2

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Hanselman v. Illinois Department of Corrections, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hanselman-v-illinois-department-of-corrections-ilsd-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack