Hannon v. Wahl
This text of Hannon v. Wahl (Hannon v. Wahl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SEAN HANNON, : No. 1:23-CV-1322 Petitioner : : (Judge Munley) V. : MARK WAHL, : Respondent :
ORDER AND NOW, in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Petitioner Sean Hannon’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED. 2. Acertificate of appealability shall not issue, as Hannon has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, see 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), or that “jurists of reason would find it debatable” whether this court’s procedural rulings are correct, Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
Date: 3 (B OURT: | / | / | bd St cae \ _ JUDGE JULIA K. MUNEEY \ United States T
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hannon v. Wahl, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hannon-v-wahl-pamd-2024.