Hannon v. Wahl

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SEAN HANNON, : No. 1:23-CV-1322 Petitioner : : (Judge Munley) V. : MARK WAHL, : Respondent :

ORDER AND NOW, in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Petitioner Sean Hannon’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED. 2. Acertificate of appealability shall not issue, as Hannon has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, see 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), or that “jurists of reason would find it debatable” whether this court’s procedural rulings are correct, Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

Date: 3 (B OURT: | / | / | bd St cae \ _ JUDGE JULIA K. MUNEEY \ United States T