Hanly v. Commissioner

Board of Tax Appeals

Hanly v. Commissioner

6 B.T.A. 613, 1927 BTA LEXIS 3458

CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals

DecidedMarch 26, 1927

DocketDocket No. 8516.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 6 B.T.A. 613 (Hanly v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hanly v. Commissioner, 6 B.T.A. 613, 1927 BTA LEXIS 3458 (bta 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Littleton:

The Commissioner determined deficiencies for the calendar years 1922 and 1923 in the amounts of $1,930.56 and $65.03, respectively. The only issue urged at the hearing and concerning which evidence was submitted is whether the petitioner is entitled to a deduction in the year 1922 of $2,500, representing the cost of 25 shares of the capital stock of Coale & Company purchased in 1920 and alleged to have become worthless in 1922. The Commissioner denied the deduction.

FINDINGS OF FACT.

Petitioner is a resident of Cumberland, Md. In 1920 he purchased 25 shares of the capital stock of Coale & Company, for which he paid $2,500. He was at no time during the existence of the corporation an officer or an employee thereof. Coale & Company was a broker and jobber of coal and it possessed no physical assets. It had $800,000 in common stock outstanding. In May, 1921, the corporation became financially involved and on May 11 of that year it was placed in the hands of receivers by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The corporation was heavily in debt and claims of $3,000,000 were filed against it. The only source which the receivers had of obtaining any money to distribute to the creditors, after the expenses of the receivership, represented approximately $7,000 in cash on hand at the time and certain claims which the corporation had against others.

The receivers had, among other accounts receivable, two large claims outstanding, one against the Swiss Government for $800,000, and one against one Harvey Miller for $100,000. They also had large claims against certain railroads. In 1921 and 1922 the receivers made every effort to collect the amounts due the company which was in their charge and considerable amounts were collected. In May, 1922, the Miller claim was settled for $175,000 and this settlement was approved in that month by the bankruptcy court. In November, 1922, the claim against the Swiss Government was settled for $100,000 and this settlement was approved in that month by the bankruptcy court.

Before the end of November, 1922, the receivers had little hope of collecting any additional amounts on railroad claims. Near the end [614]*614of 1922 the receivers determined that they had collected about all they could and computed a dividend on the claims of the general creditors of 55 cents on the dollar, leaving nothing for the stockholders. At the end of 1922 the receivers well knew that the general creditors would not be paid in full. In 1922 the receivers succeeded in settling the remaining railroad claims for $100,000 which increased the total dividend paid the general creditors to 65 per cent of their claims.

The 25 shares of stock of Coale & Company owned by the petitioner were worthless at December 31, 1922, and the cost thereof was a proper deduction from gross income for that year.

Judgment will be entered for the petitioner on the issue raised after 15 days' notice, under Rule 50.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Littleton:

The Commissioner determined deficiencies for the calendar years 1922 and 1923 in the amounts of $1,930.56 and $65.03, respectively. The only issue urged at the hearing and concerning which evidence was submitted is whether the petitioner is entitled to a deduction in the year 1922 of $2,500, representing the cost of 25 shares of the capital stock of Coale & Company purchased in 1920 and alleged to have become worthless in 1922. The Commissioner denied the deduction.

FINDINGS OF FACT.

Petitioner is a resident of Cumberland, Md. In 1920 he purchased 25 shares of the capital stock of Coale & Company, for which he paid $2,500. He was at no time during the existence of the corporation an officer or an employee thereof. Coale & Company was a broker and jobber of coal and it possessed no physical assets. It had $800,000 in common stock outstanding. In May, 1921, the corporation became financially involved and on May 11 of that year it was placed in the hands of receivers by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The corporation was heavily in debt and claims of $3,000,000 were filed against it. The only source which the receivers had of obtaining any money to distribute to the creditors, after the expenses of the receivership, represented approximately $7,000 in cash on hand at the time and certain claims which the corporation had against others.

The receivers had, among other accounts receivable, two large claims outstanding, one against the Swiss Government for $800,000, and one against one Harvey Miller for $100,000. They also had large claims against certain railroads. In 1921 and 1922 the receivers made every effort to collect the amounts due the company which was in their charge and considerable amounts were collected. In May, 1922, the Miller claim was settled for $175,000 and this settlement was approved in that month by the bankruptcy court. In November, 1922, the claim against the Swiss Government was settled for $100,000 and this settlement was approved in that month by the bankruptcy court.

Before the end of November, 1922, the receivers had little hope of collecting any additional amounts on railroad claims. Near the end [614]*614of 1922 the receivers determined that they had collected about all they could and computed a dividend on the claims of the general creditors of 55 cents on the dollar, leaving nothing for the stockholders. At the end of 1922 the receivers well knew that the general creditors would not be paid in full. In 1922 the receivers succeeded in settling the remaining railroad claims for $100,000 which increased the total dividend paid the general creditors to 65 per cent of their claims.

The 25 shares of stock of Coale & Company owned by the petitioner were worthless at December 31, 1922, and the cost thereof was a proper deduction from gross income for that year.

Judgment will be entered for the petitioner on the issue raised after 15 days' notice, under Rule 50.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 B.T.A. 613, 1927 BTA LEXIS 3458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hanly-v-commissioner-bta-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack