Hankins v. State

663 So. 2d 684, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12460, 1995 WL 704727
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hankins v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8061
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 1, 1995·No. No. 94-2693·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Alvin Hankins appeals the sentences imposed following the entry of his guilty pleas. We agree that there is a discrepancy between the verbal pronouncement of the sentence in Case No. 94-32878 and the written order and we remand to the trial court to resolve the conflict. See Wilkins v. State, 543 So.2d 800 (Fla. 5th DCA), review denied, 554 So.2d 1170 (Fla.1989). The State concedes that the imposition of a $30 fee to “First Step” as a condition of probation in Case No. 88-1850 is not authorized and must be stricken.

We find no merit to the other issues raised by Hankins. Accordingly, as corrected, we reverse and remand only as to Case No. 94-32878.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED as to Case No. 94-32878.

PETERSON, C.J., and COBB and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hankins v. State, 663 So. 2d 684, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12460, 1995 WL 704727 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

663 So. 2d 684 (Hankins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilkins v. State
543 So. 2d 800 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)