Hankins v. State

677 So. 2d 112, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8061, 1996 WL 426391
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 31, 1996·No. No. 96-1128·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court summarily denied appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Appellant alleged ineffective assistance of counsel based on trial counsel’s failure to assert his speedy trial rights.

The trial court failed to attach those parts of the record that would conclusively show that appellant is not entitled to relief. Therefore, we reverse and remand this cause to the trial court with instructions to either conduct an evidentiary hearing or to attach those parts of the record showing that appellant is not entitled to relief. See Carter v. State, 632 So.2d 1139 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). See also Toliver v. State, 652 So.2d 1291 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DELL, FARMER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hankins v. State, 677 So. 2d 112, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8061, 1996 WL 426391 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

677 So. 2d 112 (Hankins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hankins v. State
105 So. 3d 574 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Williams v. State
815 So. 2d 734 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Collins v. State
795 So. 2d 1066 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)