Hankerson v. State
987 So. 2d 768, 2008 WL 2744453
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hankerson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 4209 →
Opinion
Travis HANKERSON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Travis Hankerson, South Bay, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Hamilton v. State, 981 So.2d 615 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); Rouse v. State, 965 So.2d 201 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007).
SHAHOOD, C.J., KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hankerson v. State, 987 So. 2d 768, 2008 WL 2744453 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).
987 So. 2d 768 (Hankerson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rouse v. State
965 So. 2d 201 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Hamilton v. State
981 So. 2d 615 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)