Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Hanfgarn v. Mark

Hanfgarn v. Mark

249 A.D. 816, 292 N.Y.S. 1017, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9849
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hanfgarn v. Mark. Read the opinion of the Court — 248 A.D. 325 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 8, 1937·Published

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. [See 248 App. Div. 331; ante, p. 743, and p. 776.] The following question is certified: Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action? Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ. •

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hanfgarn v. Mark, 249 A.D. 816, 292 N.Y.S. 1017, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9849 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

249 A.D. 816 (Hanfgarn v. Mark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bethlehem Fabricators, Inc. v. Wills, Taylor & Mafera Corp.
248 A.D. 331 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)