Hanfgarn v. Mark
249 A.D. 776, 292 N.Y.S. 1012, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5967
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hanfgarn v. Mark. Read the opinion of the Court — 248 A.D. 325 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 28, 1936·Published
Opinion
On reargument, order denying motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the action affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young and Johnston, JJ., concur; Davis .and Adel, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and to dismiss the complaint. [Revd., 274 N. Y. 22. See 248 App. Div. 325; ante, p. 743.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hanfgarn v. Mark, 249 A.D. 776, 292 N.Y.S. 1012, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5967 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).
249 A.D. 776 (Hanfgarn v. Mark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hanfgarn v. Mark
8 N.E.2d 47 (New York Court of Appeals, 1937)
Hanfgarn v. Mark
248 A.D. 325 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)