Handsel v. Handsel

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Handsel v. Handsel

614 So. 2d 631, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2151, 1993 WL 45216

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 23, 1993

DocketNo. 92-1131

StatusPublished

This text of 614 So. 2d 631 (Handsel v. Handsel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Handsel v. Handsel, 614 So. 2d 631, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2151, 1993 WL 45216 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lenard Handsel appeals from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage.

We affirm. If a trial court’s ruling is correct for any reason that appears in the record, its judgment will be affirmed. In re Estate of Yohn, 238 So.2d 290 (Fla. 1970); Board of County Commissioners of Dade County v. Lowas, 348 So.2d 13 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), cert. denied, 358 So.2d 128 (Fla.1978). The award of lump sum alimony did not constitute an abuse of discretion, as it partially compensated the wife for the overwhelming medical expenses incurred and anticipated because of the husband’s egregious behavior. See Fernandez v. Fernandez, 511 So.2d 656 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) (award to wife of lump sum alimony consisting of parties’ major marital assets not abuse of discretion in light of permanent disability to wife caused when husband shot her in the face), rev. denied, 519 So.2d 986 (Fla.1988). See also § 61.08, Fla.Stat. (1991) (when awarding alimony, court “may consider any other factor necessary to do equity and justice between the parties”).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Lenard Handsel appeals from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage.

We affirm. If a trial court’s ruling is correct for any reason that appears in the record, its judgment will be affirmed. In re Estate of Yohn, 238 So.2d 290 (Fla. 1970); Board of County Commissioners of Dade County v. Lowas, 348 So.2d 13 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), cert. denied, 358 So.2d 128 (Fla.1978). The award of lump sum alimony did not constitute an abuse of discretion, as it partially compensated the wife for the overwhelming medical expenses incurred and anticipated because of the husband’s egregious behavior. See Fernandez v. Fernandez, 511 So.2d 656 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) (award to wife of lump sum alimony consisting of parties’ major marital assets not abuse of discretion in light of permanent disability to wife caused when husband shot her in the face), rev. denied, 519 So.2d 986 (Fla.1988). See also § 61.08, Fla.Stat. (1991) (when awarding alimony, court “may consider any other factor necessary to do equity and justice between the parties”).

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

614 So. 2d 631, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2151, 1993 WL 45216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/handsel-v-handsel-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack