Hampton v. State

489 So. 2d 49, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6460
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hampton v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 12 Fla. L. Weekly 807
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 19, 1986·No. No. 85-2745·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

The motion for rehearing is granted, the PER CURIAM affirmance of January 8th, 1986, set aside and the following substituted therefor:

The appellant’s pro se brief received on January 24th, 1986, has been fully considered by this court, as have four case filings, including two proceedings pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, prior to the one before us now.

We find no merit in the current Rule 3.850 appeal.

AFFIRMED.

DOWNEY, LETTS, JJ. and HURLEY, DANIEL T.K., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hampton v. State, 489 So. 2d 49, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6460 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

489 So. 2d 49 (Hampton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.