Hampton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hampton v. State

489 So. 2d 49, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6460

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 19, 1986

DocketNo. 85-2745

StatusPublished

This text of 489 So. 2d 49 (Hampton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hampton v. State, 489 So. 2d 49, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6460 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

The motion for rehearing is granted, the PER CURIAM affirmance of January 8th, 1986, set aside and the following substituted therefor:

The appellant’s pro se brief received on January 24th, 1986, has been fully considered by this court, as have four case filings, including two proceedings pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, prior to the one before us now.

We find no merit in the current Rule 3.850 appeal.

AFFIRMED.

DOWNEY, LETTS, JJ. and HURLEY, DANIEL T.K., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI