Hampton v. Richland County Council
This text of 370 S.E.2d 714 (Hampton v. Richland County Council) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
J. B. Ness, Acting Associate Justice:
We issued a writ of certiorari to review the opinion of the Court of Appeals reported at 292 S. C. 500, 357 S. E. (2d) 463 (Ct. App. 1987). After the careful consideration of the briefs and arguments, we have decided the writ was improvidently granted. We note, however, that the discussion of the so-called Fasano1 doctrine in the Court of Appeals’ opinion is clearly unnecessary to a resolution of the issue before the court and is therefore dicta. See Johnson v. Atlantic Coast Line R.Co., 142 S. C. 125, 140 S. E. 443 (1927).
Accordingly, the writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
Writ dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
370 S.E.2d 714, 296 S.C. 72, 1988 S.C. LEXIS 91, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hampton-v-richland-county-council-sc-1988.