Hampton v. Cook

872 F.2d 1025, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 5012, 1989 WL 37427
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedApril 14, 1989
Docket88-6421
StatusUnpublished

This text of 872 F.2d 1025 (Hampton v. Cook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hampton v. Cook, 872 F.2d 1025, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 5012, 1989 WL 37427 (6th Cir. 1989).

Opinion

872 F.2d 1025

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Joseph Craig HAMPTON, also known as As-Salaam Alaikum,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Howard COOK, Warden, MTRC; Larry Lack, Warden, Turney
Center; Donall Campbell, Associate Warden, Turney Center;
Danny L. Administrative Warden, Turney Center; Chessoor,
Lt., Turney Center; Calorie, Kitchen Supervisor; John Doe,
Correctional Officer, Turney Center; Carroll, Officer,
Turney Center; John Doe, Correctional Officer, Turney
Center; Connie S. Milan, Correctional Officer, Turney
Center; Jackson, Officer, Correctional Officer, Turney
Center, in their individual & official capacities,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 88-6421.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

April 14, 1989.

Before NATHANIEL R. JONES, WELLFORD and RALPH B. GUY, Jr., Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This court entered an order on January 12, 1989, directing the appellant to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because of a late notice of appeal. The appellant has failed to respond.

It appears from the record that the judgment was entered November 7, 1988. The notice of appeal filed on December 14, 1988 was 7 days late. Fed.R.App.P. 4(a) and 26(a).

The failure of an appellant to timely file a notice of appeal deprives an appellate court of jurisdiction. Compliance with Fed.R.App.P. 4(a) is a mandatory and jurisdictional prerequisite which this court can neither waive nor extend. McMillan v. Barksdale, 823 F.2d 981, 982 (6th Cir.1987); Myers v. Ace Hardware, Inc., 777 F.2d 1099, 1102 (6th Cir.1985); Denley v. Shearson/American Express, Inc., 733 F.2d 39, 41 (6th Cir.1984) (per curiam); Peake v. First Nat'l Bank & Trust Co., 717 F.2d 1016, 1018 (6th Cir.1983). Fed.R.App.P. 26(b) specifically provides that this court cannot enlarge the time for filing a notice of appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Rule 9(b)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
872 F.2d 1025, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 5012, 1989 WL 37427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hampton-v-cook-ca6-1989.