Hampson v. Edelen

2 H. & J. 64
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedJune 15, 1806
StatusPublished
Cited by24 cases

This text of 2 H. & J. 64 (Hampson v. Edelen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hampson v. Edelen, 2 H. & J. 64 (Md. 1806).

Opinion

Chase, Ch. J.

delivered the opinion of the court. In this case it appears that a considerable part of the purchase money was paid, and possession given of the land, prior to the obtention of the judgments by Hampson against Wade.

A contract for land, bona fide made for a valuable consideration, vests the equitable interest in the vendee from the time of the execution of the contract, although the money is not paid at that time. When the money is paid according to the terms of the contract, the vendee is entitled to a conveyance, and to a decree in chancery for a specific execution of the contract, if such conveyance is refused.

A judgment obtained by a third person against the vendor, mesne the making the contract and the payment of the money, cannot defeat or impair the equitable interest thus acquired, nor is it a lien on the land to affect the right of such cestui que trust.

A judgment is a lien on the land of the debtor, and attaches on it as a fund for its payment; but the legal estaté in the land is not vested in the judgment creditor, although lie can convert it into money, to satisfy his debt, by pursuing the proper means.

DECREE AFFIRMED,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grant v. Kahn
18 A.3d 91 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2011)
Washington Mutual Bank v. Homan
974 A.2d 376 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2009)
Chambers v. Cardinal
935 A.2d 502 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2007)
Stebbins-Anderson Co. v. Bolton
117 A.2d 908 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2001)
DeShields v. Broadwater
659 A.2d 300 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1995)
Coe v. Hays
614 A.2d 576 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1992)
Watson v. Watson
497 A.2d 794 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1985)
Himmighoefer v. Medallion Industries, Inc.
487 A.2d 282 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1985)
Eastern Shore Building & Loan Corp. v. Bank of Somerset
253 A.2d 367 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1969)
Jackson v. County Trust Co.
6 A.2d 380 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1939)
Caltrider v. Caples
153 A. 445 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1931)
Union Trust Co. v. Biggs
137 A. 509 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1927)
May v. Emerson
96 P. 454 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1908)
Wm. Skinner & Sons' Ship-Building & Dry-Dock Co. v. Houghton
48 A. 85 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1900)
Hume v. Riggs
12 App. D.C. 355 (D.C. Circuit, 1898)
Berryhill v. Potter
44 N.W. 251 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1890)
Hartsock v. Russell
52 Md. 619 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1879)
Dyson v. Simmons
48 Md. 207 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1878)
Lane v. Ludlow
14 F. Cas. 1081 (Second Circuit, 1858)
Moyer v. Hinman
17 Barb. 137 (New York Supreme Court, 1853)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 H. & J. 64, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hampson-v-edelen-md-1806.