Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Hammond v. State

Hammond v. State

127 S.E. 623, 33 Ga. App. 820, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 736
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hammond v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 34 Ga. App. 234 →
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 21, 1925·No. 16336·Published

Opinion

Bloodwokth, J.

This case is controlled by the rulings in Mooney v. State, 32 Ga. App. 448 (123 S. E. 734), and Baugh v. State, 32 Ga. App. 496 (123 S. E. 923), in each of which this court held that the evidence was not sufficient to support the verdict.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luhe, J., concur. Carlisle Cobb, for plaintiff in error,

cited: Ga. App. Rep.,: 1/519; 3/322; 4/392; 27/184.

Ilenry H. West, solicitor-general,

cited: 119 Ga. 429 (3); 118. Ga. 784; 126 Ga. 570.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hammond v. State, 127 S.E. 623, 33 Ga. App. 820, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 736 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

127 S.E. 623 (Hammond v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Welborn v. State
46 S.E. 645 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)
Carter v. State
55 S.E. 477 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Mooney v. State
123 S.E. 734 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Baugh v. State
123 S.E. 923 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)