Carter v. State
This text of 55 S.E. 477 (Carter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
One wlio wanders and strolls about in idleness, with no lawful purpose or object whatever, an habitual loafer, idler, and vagabond, who is able to work, has no property, no reasonably continuous employment, and no regular income, is a vagrant within the meaning of the Penal Code, §453, par. 3; and this is true notwithstanding such person may have a fixed place of abode, where he usually lodges. Acts 1903, p. 46. Especially would such person be a vagrant when his loafing and loitering was about pool-rooms, bar-rooms, dives, lewd houses, and other places of like character.
2. The evidence, though conflicting at some points, was sufficient to authorize the verdict, and no sufficient reason has been shown for reversing the judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
55 S.E. 477, 126 Ga. 570, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-state-ga-1906.