Hammond v. Nelson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hammond v. Nelson

73 N.Y.S. 1136

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 19, 1901·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The court declines to consider the appeal in this case because the record is _ imperfect. (1) The affidavit of Warren F. Miller and the notice of motion for judgment of foreclosure, noted in the order as having been read on the motion, are not printed in the record. (2) The affidavits of James C. Beecher, Jacob T. Smith, and Allison K. Hume, which are printed in the record, are not recited in the order as having been read on the motion. (3) The order should be resettled, so as to show what papers were used before the judge, and such papers should be printed in the record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The court declines to consider the appeal in this case because the record is _ imperfect. (1) The affidavit of Warren F. Miller and the notice of motion for judgment of foreclosure, noted in the order as having been read on the motion, are not printed in the record. (2) The affidavits of James C. Beecher, Jacob T. Smith, and Allison K. Hume, which are printed in the record, are not recited in the order as having been read on the motion. (3) The order should be resettled, so as to show what papers were used before the judge, and such papers should be printed in the record.

Hammond v. Nelson, 73 N.Y.S. 1136 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1901).

Pincite

73 N.Y.S. 1136 (Hammond v. Nelson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.