Hammond v. Nelson
This text of 73 N.Y.S. 1136 (Hammond v. Nelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court declines to consider the appeal in this case because the record is _ imperfect. (1) The affidavit of Warren F. Miller and the notice of motion for judgment of foreclosure, noted in the order as having been read on the motion, are not printed in the record. (2) The affidavits of James C. Beecher, Jacob T. Smith, and Allison K. Hume, which are printed in the record, are not recited in the order as having been read on the motion. (3) The order should be resettled, so as to show what papers were used before the judge, and such papers should be printed in the record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 N.Y.S. 1136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hammond-v-nelson-nyappdiv-1901.