Hammon v. Barry

841 F.2d 426, 268 U.S. App. D.C. 304
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided March 18, 1988·No. Nos. 85-5669, 85-5670 and 85-5671·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of this Court’s en banc orders of February 26, 1988, and March 4, 1988, in Nos. 86-5377 and 86-5378, Joseph J. Ledoux v. District of Columbia, granting the joint motion to remand and dismiss, and vacating this Court’s opinion, it is

ORDERED, by the Court en banc, on its own motion, that the order of November 20, 1987, 833 F.2d 367, granting rehearing by the Court en banc in Hammon be, and the same hereby is, vacated.

A dissenting statement of Circuit Judge MIKVA, joined by Chief Judge WALD and Circuit Judges ROBINSON, RUTH BAD-ER GINSBURG and EDWARDS, is attached.

Dissenting Statement Accompanying Order Revoking Previous Order to Rehear Hammon v. Barry (No. 85-5669) En Banc.

Dissenting Statement filed by Circuit Judge MIKVA, in which Chief Judge WALD, and Circuit Judges ROBINSON, RUTH BADER GINSBURG and EDWARDS join.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hammon v. Barry, 841 F.2d 426, 268 U.S. App. D.C. 304 (D.C. Cir. 1988).

841 F.2d 426 (Hammon v. Barry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related