Hammer v. Rasmussen (Child Custody)
This text of Hammer v. Rasmussen (Child Custody) (Hammer v. Rasmussen (Child Custody)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
JULIE HAMMER; AND GONZALO No. 70647 GALINDO,
vs. Appellants, FILED MARY JOHANNA RASMUSSEN, A/K/A AUG 0 9 2016 MURPHY JO RASMUSSEN, Respondent.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from an "Order from December 6, 2012," entered May 18, 2016, directing the parties to submit information required in NRS 125B.055 and NRS 125B.230 to the court and the Welfare Division of the Department of Human Resources; an order entered May 10, 2016, from a February 3,2014, minute order confirming the contents of a JAVS video of a hearing and clarifying findings in an order entered October 17, 2013; and a June 27, 2016, order appointing a special master/parenting coordinator. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; Frank P. Sullivan, Judge; Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; Bill Henderson, Judge; Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Gayle Nathan, Judge; Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; Lisa M. Brown, Judge. Our review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals jurisdictional defects. Specifically, it appears that the judgments or orders designated in the notice of appeal are not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b). This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A e rule. Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev. 207, 678 P.2d 1152 (1984). No statutes or court rules provide for an appeal from an order directing parties to submit information required in NRS 125B.055 and NRS 125B.230; an order confirming the contents of a JAVS video of a hearing and clarifying findings; or an order appointing a special master/parenting coordinator. Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction, and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
hia-t AA; , J. Hardesty
Saitta
J.
cc: Hon. Lisa M. Brown, District Judge, Family Court Division Hon. Gayle Nathan, District Judge Hon. Frank P. Sullivan, District Judge, Family Court Division Hon. Bill Henderson, District Judge, Family Court Division Gonzalo Galindo Julie Hammer Black & LoBello Eighth District Court Clerk
• SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
1947A 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hammer v. Rasmussen (Child Custody), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hammer-v-rasmussen-child-custody-nev-2016.