Hammer v. Rasmussen (Child Custody)
This text of Hammer v. Rasmussen (Child Custody) (Hammer v. Rasmussen (Child Custody)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
JULIE L. HAMMER; GONZALO I. No. 78858 GALINDO-MILAN, A/K/A GONZALO I. GALINDO, Appellants, vs. FILED MARY JOHANNA RASMUSSEN, Respondent. JUN 2 4 M19 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BY RK
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court's October 17, 2013, decision regarding custody of a minor child. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Mathew Harter, Judge. Review of the notice of appeal and documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. The district court's October 17, 2013, oral decision and minute order are of no effect and cannot be appealed. See State, Div. Child & Fam. Services v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 445,454, 92 P.3d 1239, 1245 (2004) (ID]ispositional court orders that are not administrative in nature, but deal with the procedural posture or merits of the underlying controversy, must be written, signed, and filed before they become effective."). Moreover, it appears that the district court entered a written order on November 22, 2013, memorializing its October 17, 2013, decision. Notice of entry of that order was served on appellants on November 22, 2013. Accordingly, to the extent appellants appeal from the November 22, 2013, order, and the order is substantively appealable, the
0 notice of appeal is untimely and does not invoke this courfs jurisdiction.1 See Healy v. Volkswagenwwerk, 103 Nev. 329, 331, 741 P.2d 432, 433 (1987) (An untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court). Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
Pickering
Par aguirre Cadish
cc: Hon. Mathew Harter, District Judge Gonzalo I. Galindo-Milan Julie L. Hammer Black & LoBello Eighth District Court Clerk
'This court also notes the order states "that all parties have waived their right to appeal this Final Order."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hammer v. Rasmussen (Child Custody), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hammer-v-rasmussen-child-custody-nev-2019.